The reason that Romney and Ryan didn't bring it up seems clear: their strategy for winning is to have the electorate to focus on the economy.
But why didn't Obama or Biden mention it? Climate change, including funding "green energy" and attempting to pass cap-and-trade, was a central focus of their first term. Further, Democrats claim that anyone who rejects the catastrophic
REMINDER: Over 30,000 American scientists, including over 9,000 Ph.D.s, have publicly signed this petition skeptical of global warming alarmism.
MORE: A video history of global warming in presidential election year debates going back to Bentson-Quayle is here.
PREVIOUSLY on eco-hypocrisy:
•Obama is not carbon neutral II
•Pres. Obama is not carbon-neutral
•Study: Environmentalists more likely to "cheat" and "steal"
•The UN's global warming advocates vs. their own carbon footprint
•Eco-hypocrite of the day: supermodel Giselle
•The ever-increasing energy use of Al Gore's mansion
•With five private jets, Travolta still lectures on global warming.
PREVIOUSLY on the public response to global warming:
•Global warming provokes laughter, even in the San Francisco Bay Area
•Public not buying UN IPCC propaganda
PREVIOUSLY on this Fall's debates:
•Obama-Romney final (3rd) debate recap: who won?
•Romney-Obama 2nd debate: instant poll results on who won
•Biden-Ryan VP Debate: Instant poll results on who won
•2nd debate: Did Obama really call Benghazi an "act of terror"?
•VP Debate follow-up: White House claims ignorance as its defense