In the Financial Times, Richard Tomkins investigates a "paradox":
So, we come back to imprisonment. But now we have a paradox. Crime is falling, yet we are locking more people up. Why?The answer, of course, is that for every year a criminal spends in prison is a year in which he is not committing crimes against innocent people. Since criminals reportedly commit an average of 140 crimes per year, increased imprisonment has a major effect on crime rates. The only question is why is it that liberals consider this obvious point to be a "paradox"?
Powered by ScribeFire.